Skip to main content

A coworker who notices what you don’t.

Thruit listens to your meetings, threads them together, and keeps a living record — every person you work with, every theme that recurs, every commitment that gets made. Plain markdown in a private git repo you own. Every fact links back to the moment it was said.

Knowledge work runs on people and patterns — and most of both go uncaptured. You meet someone, they tell you what matters to them, and three months later when it matters again you’re rebuilding the context from scratch.

The patterns are worse. The same complaint shows up in five different meetings under five different names. The cross-cutting story is invisible until someone reads back through every transcript. Thruit reads them all, then writes the story for you.

The loop is simple.

You record a meeting in-browser, or paste in notes you already have. The input lands in your workspace as transcripts/2026-04-25-budget-review.md — plain markdown, source-of-truth.

Within seconds, the audio is transcribed. Within minutes, every fact, name, and commitment in it gets pulled into the right file — people/marcus.md, themes/budget.md, commitments/2026-04-25.md — and each bullet carries a citation back to the exact line where it was said.

On its own, Thruit re-reads what you’ve fed it and re-organizes. Cross-cutting patterns get drafted as pain-points.md and opportunities.md. Pre-meeting prep docs assemble themselves a day or two before anything on your calendar.

Every step is a git commit you can read, blame, and roll back.

Most knowledge tools store your data inside their database. Thruit doesn’t. Your workspace is a private git repository — plain markdown files in plain folders, owned by you, cloneable anywhere.

That choice does several things at once. There’s no export format because nothing was ever proprietary; you walk away with git clone. There’s a complete history because every change — yours, the system’s — is a commit; you can see when a fact arrived, where it came from, and what added it. The editor you already use can open the same files the web app shows; the web is one way in, not the only way.

Everything is auditable. Nothing is locked.

Thruit fits a specific person.

Someone embedded inside one organization — a director, an operations lead, a consultant on a long engagement, anyone whose work runs on dozens of overlapping people and initiatives. Someone who’s tried five note-taking apps and bounced off all of them because the maintenance burden is the actual job.

Thruit is not a team tool. It’s not a dashboard. It’s not built for real-time collaboration. It’s built for the one person who’s been running the system in their head and is finally ready to let something quietly help.

If that’s you, start a workspace. The first one’s free to try.


thruit/workspace/

Inside a workspace

thruit/
├── people/
│ ├── alana-park.md
│ ├── elena-vasquez.md
│ ├── jordan-hines.md
│ └── marcus-reeves.md
├── themes/
│ ├── budget-q3.md
│ ├── employee-retention.md
│ ├── racking-purchase.md
│ └── warehouse-floor-policy.md
├── transcripts/
│ ├── 2026-04-08-staff-monday.md
│ ├── 2026-04-15-marcus-1on1.md
│ ├── 2026-04-22-team-meeting.md
│ └── 2026-04-25-budget-review.md
├── prep/
│ └── marcus-2026-04-29.md
├── pain-points.md
├── opportunities.md
└── patterns.md

A polished person file

people/marcus-reeves.md

Marcus Reeves — Warehouse GM

Background

  • Role: Warehouse General Manager, Northbay Logistics (3PL)(src: transcripts/2026-04-15-marcus-1on1.md#L12)
  • Lives in: Conway; ~45-minute commute(src: transcripts/2026-04-15-marcus-1on1.md#L12)
  • 5 years prior in East Coast warehousing; not 3PL — still learning the nuance(src: transcripts/2026-04-15-marcus-1on1.md#L24)

What Marcus wants from Sam

  • A cross-department project calendar — Special Projects + Inventory routinely double-book the same people(src: transcripts/2026-04-22-team-meeting.md#L41)
  • General visibility into what's happening outside the warehouse floor(src: transcripts/2026-04-22-team-meeting.md#L48)

What Sam wants from Marcus

  • Steady the team through the Strafford move; he expects 5–10% attrition(src: transcripts/2026-04-25-budget-review.md#L88)
  • Push the gradual cell phone policy through despite floor pushback(src: transcripts/2026-04-08-staff-monday.md#L24)

Notes

  • Endorsed Supabase as the right first step for digital ops(src: transcripts/2026-04-22-team-meeting.md#L176)
  • Wants to install a wired speaker system himself, $250 in materials, scissor lift, single weekend(src: transcripts/2026-04-15-marcus-1on1.md#L41)

Cross-cutting patterns

pain-points.md

Pain points — Q3 themes

Cross-department scheduling is a constant collision

Special Projects and Inventory are routinely fighting over the same warehouse staff. Marcus has flagged this directly; Alana has implied it through repeated complaints about being borrowed for racking work mid-shift. There is no shared calendar anyone references.

  • marcus-reeves.mdno direct project schedule that people can actually reference(src: transcripts/2026-04-22-team-meeting.md#L41)
  • alana-park.mdI keep getting pulled off my own work for racking projects(src: transcripts/2026-04-15-staff-monday.md#L83)
  • jordan-hines.mdproposed a shared scheduling spreadsheet two months ago(src: transcripts/2026-04-08-staff-monday.md#L142)

Strafford move is a quiet attrition risk

The new facility adds 30+ minutes to commutes for several long-tenured staff. Marcus expects 5–10% turnover; the team's mood reads more brittle than that. Three people have asked about hybrid options that don't exist yet.

  • marcus-reeves.mdI'd lose maybe 5–10% but personally I'm optimistic(src: transcripts/2026-04-25-budget-review.md#L88)
  • alana-park.mdasked twice about remote eligibility for ops planning(src: transcripts/2026-04-22-team-meeting.md#L155)

Phone policy enforcement is splitting the team

Marcus wants gradual rollout (phones on person, not in use). Miranda wants phones off the floor entirely. Without a written escalation path, individual supervisors are improvising — which is what Marcus was specifically trying to prevent.

  • marcus-reeves.mdpush for gradual cell phone policy despite floor pushback(src: transcripts/2026-04-08-staff-monday.md#L24)
  • themes/warehouse-floor-policy.mdMiranda's stricter alternative(src: transcripts/2026-04-22-team-meeting.md#L102)

Every change is a commit

Real git, not a “git-like” UI. Clone the repo and read the history yourself.

$ git log --oneline
c40f102 polish: people/marcus-reeves.md
32b7b9b agent-d: workspace rollup
1b3cc8e extract: append people/marcus-reeves.md
b0a1c67 transcribe: 2026-04-25-budget-review
2f56fa8e prep: prep/marcus-2026-04-29.md
a486b496 agent-c: cross-cutting patterns
e870baf4 extract: append people/alana-park.md
953906e3 extract: create themes/budget-q3.md
3d820401 extract: append people/marcus-reeves.md
7d56b800 transcribe: 2026-04-22-team-meeting
2b17f7f3 extract: create themes/warehouse-floor-policy.md